Here below you can find an example of  mind map we started. You can start from this point or produce something yours. What is important is that you use it to collect information, judgments, opinions, comments and everything you think could be useful to construct a first clear representation as complete as possible of the way the topic is faced up.

The  mind map could be one of the first slides of your presentation. To realize it well, we suggest you to:

- use the first level of the rays to title the slides and the next levels as list points;

- be essential in the contents, limiting them to key-concepts and exposing orally the descriptions, narrative and exemplifying parts or using direct links to the web materials you previously selected and analyzed;

- collect the most significant URLs in a sort of sitegraphy placed in the last slide.

The article should have the typical setting out of an expositive text, in other words being exhaustive about its public exigency, precise in the lexicon, linear in the syntax and marked in distinct logical parts. As to this: each first level knot of the map (each slide) could correspond to one of the segments of your work, that we suggest you to divide in homogeneous titled paragraphs. The sublevels (list-points of the slides) could help you to set out the indents and the periods of each paragraph. Other necessary characteristics are the following:

- to contain not only key-concepts, but also, for example, some narrations and the necessary descriptions – not everybody knows, for example, Facebook interface, and that will be defined without using the direct link;

- to use images with a clear caption. Images do not replace the text, but they clarify it;

- to use quotations, but with a clear indication of the sources;

- to draw up correctly balanced paragraphs also from the quantitative point of view. Count not only the lines, but also the strokes and do not exceed 10.000 types, spaces included;

- to place possible explicative notes at the bottom of the page;

- to being attached with a site-bibliography.

As you have seen, we suggest you to use two search engines. So, in the key-words review you used we want you to:

- distinguish one from the other;

- list the key-words you effectively used;

- explain which combinations were more effective and why, in both cases.